People spend more time in front
of computer now than before, and this means less time actually interacting in
three dimensions. This is obviously not helpful and needs no detailed explanation.
“But wait,”
you say. “The internet allows like-minded people to find each other, to get
together, form groups, societies, go camping, hunt for children online, say
hateful things under the influence of anonymity, and other great stuff.”
If one
associates exclusively with others of like mind,
divergent ideas are less likely to meet each other and be reconciled, over
beer. Instead, a kind of intellectual or ideological incest takes place in
which highly specialized (e.g. perverted) views are cultivated at the expense
of diversity or “genetic drift.” People become more radicalized rather than
being forced to confront and deal with different points of view. Conflict
resolution skills are taught by first-person shooter video games rather than
the collective wisdom of real adults, or a rock falling on your head, for
example, which can teach you a lot.
This is
similar to the ill-fated notion of being able to choose your own musical tracks
rather than an entire album. Almost
invariably, the songs you choose
will not be the ones you most need to hear. And again, an opportunity for
growth is missed.
It doesn’t have to be this way. . .
March
2007