“But once a climate
of common understanding comes to be created around the threat to the
environment, the situation changes. There remain, of course, battles between
local groups and the general public. Everyone sees the need for a dump, but no
one wants it in their back yard. Nevertheless, some local battles come to be
seen in a new light, they come to be differently enframed. The preservation of
some wilderness areas, for instance, the conservation of some threatened
species, the protection against some devastating assault on the environment
come to be seen as part of a new common purpose. As so often is the case, the mechanism of inevitability work only when people are divided
and fragmented. The predicament alters when there comes to be a common
consciousness.
We don’t want to exaggerate our
degrees of freedom. But they are not zero. And that means that coming to
understand the moral sources of our civilization can make a difference, in so
far as it can contribute to a new common understanding.”